One of the most prestigious actors in the Telugu movie industry, Magastar Chiranjeevi has found himself in the center of a large controversy. During a pre -relief event, the experienced actor gave statements that many have considered sexist and inappropriate, which led to widespread criticism. His comments about Grandpa’s many relationships and his priority for a male granddaughter have triggered dissatisfaction, where Netizenes and Social Comments have called him to promote regressive ideas.
In this program, Chiranjeevi was shown a picture of his grandfather and remembered him, he described him as a great romantic. He said in more detail that his grandfather would visit another house when he was bored with his two wives. He mentioned carelessly that his grandfather had three or four houses back, and implemented several conditions.
This statement quickly attracted attention because many people realized that glorifying such behavior was insensitive and unfair. Creating light of polygamy conditions, especially in today’s context, is not good with a large part of the audience. Critics reported that such comments may indirectly be adultery and normal patriarchal practice.
However, the dispute did not end there. Chiranjeevi also gave a statement about a grandson’s desire instead of a granddaughter. He revealed that he had asked his son, actor Ram Charan about a male child when he felt like a “Ladies Hostel Warden” when he was surrounded by grandchildren. He said that his house was already full of girls and that he wanted a boy to continue the legacy of the family.
While some people may claim that this comment was made in gesture, the underlying implication is that a male child is needed for continuity in inheritance, many people twisted. At a time when equality is actively discussed and promoted, such statements were seen as retrograde and derogatory against women.
Social Media Backlash and Public Outrage
As soon as Chiranjeevi statements became viral, social media broke out of criticism. Many users narrowed them into their old ideas and asked why a male child had to continue the legacy of the family. The commentary on grandfather’s romantic life was also much condemned as unfair and insensitive.
Many Twitter and Instagram users criticized the actor, indicating such comments promoting patriarchal thinking trying to move away from society. Some accused him of disregarding the progress made in equality, while others emphasized the irony that such statements came from a dear actor who played a strong and progressive role on the screen.
Some prominent feminists and gender rights activists also weighed the dispute. He claimed that influential figures like Chiranjevi should be more distracted about his words, as they have a significant impact on public belief. According to him, reinforcing statements in the child’s birth send a harmful message, which reduces the idea that daughters are equally able to carry the names and values of the family.
While many fans expressed disappointment, Andre Chiranjeevi defended and stated that his comments were made humorous and should not be taken very seriously. However, criticized the support of the Great Scale, and sought more responsibility from celebrities when they made public comments.
Bollywood and Tollywood Celebrities React
The dispute around Chiranjeevi statements attracted the attention of the people of the film industry. Some co -actors and inner industrial sources dealt with the case, although he waived most of the direct criticism of Megastar.
Some actors and filmmakers expressed their disagreement, emphasizing the importance of gender plate approaches in modern times. A well -known Telugu filmmaker said the industry should play a role in promoting progressive values instead of strengthening old traditions.
Although there was no direct condemnation from top players, many people believed that this incident would serve as a reminder that public figures should be careful about their words, especially in a rapid growth society there in society where sexual equality is an important speech point.
The Legacy Debate: Do Sons Carry Family Names Forward?
One of the most important takeaets one of the dispute is the ongoing debate about a son is necessary to continue the family from the family. Chiranjeevi’s comments echoed a centuries-old belief that only male children could carry on the family name, but this idea has been increasingly challenged over the years.
Many successful women in industries have proven that inheritance does not depend on gender. In business, politics, entertainment and academics, women have created permanent heritage without the need for a male heir. Families all over the world have begun to use the idea that daughters are able to maintain family traditions and values.
Against Chirannevis comment, Baikalash highlighted the mentality of the transfer of society, where people are no longer ready to accept such old perceptions without questions.
Will Chiranjeevi Respond?
So far, Chiranjeevi has not released a formal response or clarification on the dispute. Given the size of setbacks, many people believe that he can address the problem to remove any misconception.
Some industry experts wonder that the actor can choose to ignore the controversy completely, hoping it will disappear over time. However, while keeping the discussion alive with social media, the remaining may not be the best way to silence.
If Chiranjeevi decides to talk about the case, their reaction will be important to shape public opinion. A thoughtful forgiveness or explanation can help increase the situation, while rejecting setbacks can provide more fuel for dissatisfaction.
Read Also :- VD12 Titled ‘Kingdom’ – A Teaser That Redefines Cinematic Brilliance
Conclusion: A Lesson in Responsible Communication
Chiranjeevi recent comments have made an important conversation about gender expectations and public data responsibilities while making statements. While some may argue that their words were exaggerated, the criticism highlights society’s evolving expectations.
In today’s world, where equality is an important issue, influential personalities should be aware of messages they explain. Chirankevis’s statement acts as a reminder, which may be unknown, although accidental can have significant results.
As the discussion of gender equality and modern family values continues, it is necessary for celebrities and public figures that they interact with their words with progressive ideals. Whether Chiranjeevi chooses to take up this controversy or not, one thing is certain – society is no longer ready to ignore the old faith without questioning them.
Follow us on Instagram
